FSGP RESULTS WEEK 1 : SEPT 2

[Sean S]

Well, not much to learn from this week, maybe the bigest surprise was Cal
putting up 58, but even that's a bit of a meh. Start to hit stride next
week I think. (Yeah, I picked TCU, as did most folks, but that wasn't a
huge upset, more like a "oh, OK" upset).
Not much to say about this week's winner, because, well;
It's me. I went 11-1 , 206 points for a score of 17.17 . My best game was
32 for OSU-SJSU , and this win puts me on top of the season standings.
Yipee? Bob, if I screwed something up this week in the spreadsheet, don't
tell me until next week. I wanna enjoy this. (just kidding, of course
tell me, but I think we're good).

FSGP RESULTS WEEK 1
01. Sean(11-1) ... 17.17 [206]
02. John(9-3) ... 16.75 [201]
03. Plaidmoon(11-1) ... 16.33 [196]
04. Warren(11-1) ... 16.25 [195]
05. Peter(8-1) ... 16.11 [145]
06. Patrick(10-1) ... 16.09 [177]
07. Bob(10-2) ... 14.08 [169]
08. Eric(9-3) ... 12.92 [155]
ASCP(11-1) ... 13.69 [164]

FSGP STANDINGS WEEK 1
01. Sean(11-1) ... 18.75 [225]
02. Plaidmoon(11-1) ... 18.17 [218]
03. Patrick(10-1) ... 17.82 [196]
04. John(9-3) ... 17.58 [211]
05. Warren(11-1) ... 17.33 [208]
06. Peter(8-1) ... 16.11 [145]
07. Bob(10-2) ... 15.75 [189]
08. Eric(9-3) ... 15.58 [187]
ASCP(11-1) ... 15.19 [182]

-= ASCP PIX n AVG SKORZ =-
SUU 15 ASU 37 [14.50]
FLA 22 UTAH 28 [16.29]
STAN 26 HAW 20 [19.43]
COL 20 TCU 40 [5.63]
PSU 15 ORE 56 [13.38]
BSU 23 WASH 36 [16.63]
CAL 27 UNT 23 [13.50]
NEV 15 USC 53 [20.88]
WSU 31 CSU 23 [14.38]
NAA 15 ZONA 36 [15.38]
CCU 26 UCLA 37 [18.50]
OSU 34 SJSU 20 [20.13]

-= D1RT33 TH1RT33Z =-
36 : Warren [UCLA-CCU]
34 : John : [USC-NEV]
32 : Sean [OSU-SJSU]

next games Sat Sept 9

[BobW]

Post by Sean S
Yipee? Bob, if I screwed something up this week in the spreadsheet, don't
tell me until next week. I wanna enjoy this. (just kidding, of course
tell me, but I think we're good).

=============
To paraphrase every football coach in America - It's just our first first week and we've got some stuff we need to get fixed. We'll look at the film and make the necessary adjustments before next week's games.

Looks like the season standings were determined by dividing the season to date scores by the 12 games in Week 1. They should be divided by the 13 games played in Weeks 0 and 1 combined.

[Sean S]

Post by BobW

Post by Sean S
Yipee? Bob, if I screwed something up this week in the spreadsheet,
don't tell me until next week. I wanna enjoy this. (just kidding, of
course tell me, but I think we're good).

=============
To paraphrase every football coach in America - It's just our first
first week and we've got some stuff we need to get fixed. We'll look
at the film and make the necessary adjustments before next week's
games.
Looks like the season standings were determined by dividing the season
to date scores by the 12 games in Week 1. They should be divided by
the 13 games played in Weeks 0 and 1 combined.

hahaha, well put - and yer right. So I "watched some film", and yeah, the
points were added to the "Totals" sheet; but not the W-L records (basically
everyone has 1 more W); which in turn changes the scores, because it adds
one more game to the forumula. I flat just flat didn't enter it to the
totals sheet, just a blank row, my bad. Ugh.
Luckily, the adjustment gave no dramatic differences in the standings, if
any, being only 1 ganme; and it's just week 1. Gonna try to go over
everything again before this week, double check, but can't lie, real life
has been pretty overwhelming; but might be able to grab an hour or two
here.

Sean